Re: Health Care WON'T cover kids with pre-existing conditions right away

LTRT Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:22 pm

Scooby01_98 wrote:Maybe they are representing there constituents that didn't want anything to do with federal government run health care. If you remember when this started in the senate Sen Grassly, Collins and one other were working with 3 dems on the senate bill. After a recess they basically weren't invited back. Lets not forget the closed door negotiations of just dems in the house. Maybe the dems are the one's that didn't listen to there constituents.

There were 40 republican amendments to the reconciliation bill in the senate, all of them shot down. (really do sexual predators need to have insurance to cover erectile problems?) Apparently the dems think they do.

Wait a minute, someone just told us that this was fantasy bull****. Twisted Evil

Markwes Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:20 pm

Oh good! We have some real debate going again! Or something like that. Twisted Evil

Markwes Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:01 am

And what the f*** is with all the this f***ing cussing! Can we f***ing just be f***ing civil here? F***!!

Scooby01_98 Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:48 pm

Wow, didn't see this coming (yeah right). Don't like part of the healthcare bill; that was a republican ideal. Really how stupid do they think people are? No offense dems, you wanted it, you voted for it, it is yours!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100327/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_overhaul_requiring_insurance

Wow, since it was in the MA bill that Romney signed and Brown voted for it must be a Republican idea. Considering the MA state legislature is made up of primarily Dems (there might be 10 republicans between both houses in MA).

I believe the number of states suing over this is now up to 15. Even MA is looking at possible suing since they are considering it double taxation due to there current law.

Scooby01_98 Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:54 pm

Wonder how many more states we will have to bailout now due to the healthcare bill? Wonder if those state legislature are happy with there dem reps and senators forcing this cost down there states. Making them responsible for other service cuts or tax increases to cover the unfunded burden this health care bill throws on them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/27/health/policy/27impact.html

jcopetti Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:21 pm

Pez wrote:
LTRT wrote:President mocks Republicans for acting is if bill is 'Armageddon'...
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2522952320100325

Looking relaxed and upbeat, he mocked Republicans for acting as if the bill would lead to "Armageddon."

"After I signed the bill, I looked around to see if there were any asteroids falling, some cracks opening up in the earth," Obama said, adding it turned out to be a nice day and "birds were chirping, folks were strolling down the mall."

Nice one Barry, play politics as usual, real nice change you brought to DC, isn't is great to have a lying narcissist as our president.

Lying and narcisstic like this, or some other way?

+1

Scooby01_98 Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:31 am

Tricare isn't your normal health insurance, it is for military people, retired, reservist, active duty. What is covered must be approved by congress. So the new healthcare law to include children up to 26 YOA needs a separate bill instead of Obamacare. So the cost of this estimated by the DOD is $2,400 per child, per year. So if the military is going to charge that amount to DOD personnel think of how much your employee paid insurance is going up by.

http://www.military.com/military-report/tricare-for-children-up-to-26

Sponsored content