McCain wants a terrorist attack?

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:If the aides for the presumptive Democratic candidate would have let the Muslim women behind him for a photo shoot or whatever, you can bet the mortgage that would have been across the internet faster than you can say "Change" and people would point to that and say, "See, he's a Muslim."

So it's ok to discriminate against people as long as it's in the name of Public Relations?

pez wrote:Just saying, some of the more conservative members of this forum jumped on the 57 states argument. And jumped on the Jeremiah Wright argument, saying that people's character is shaped by the people around them. I'm just sayin....

personally knowing how many states are in the union as opposed to having an advisor make a comment that was taken out of context about a terrorist attack aren't exactly the same thing... just sayin...

Bman wrote: ... GET REAL. Just because he is concerned about what the Right Wing will do does not mean that he plays their game.

IMHO, this next few months of mud slinging will tell a great tale. This thread is an example of the kind of volley's we should expect to see. Unfortunately I don't see an easy way for BO to maneuver in order to avoid a few stinging shots at least a few times. He's human after all. (57) Yes, the mudslinging is infantile. Yes, it's all about the contest to grasp power. Yes, it's old and tired. Yes... it's politics.

cardinal5150 wrote:

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:If the aides for the presumptive Democratic candidate would have let the Muslim women behind him for a photo shoot or whatever, you can bet the mortgage that would have been across the internet faster than you can say "Change" and people would point to that and say, "See, he's a Muslim."

So it's ok to discriminate against people as long as it's in the name of Public Relations?

WTF? What discrimination occurred? Were these people denied inalienable rights?

....weak....

cardinal5150 wrote:

Bman wrote:What distinct change have you noticed, some facts please.

In the Dem Primary.. it was all about change this, change that, we shall overcome.. blah blah blah.

Now it's all about how he's going to bring a gun to a knife fight to beat McCain and how McCain is evil and blah blah blah. He's abandoning his message of hope and change for one of "I'm not that guy".

Like I have said repeatedly ... where has Obama went negative YET? He has not ... his gun to a knife fight comment is simply stating that we are going to roll over and let the republican smear machine roll over us like John Kerry and Al Gore did. We are going to defend ourselves from false attacks, how is anything but admirable.

cardinal5150 wrote:

pez wrote:Just saying, some of the more conservative members of this forum jumped on the 57 states argument. And jumped on the Jeremiah Wright argument, saying that people's character is shaped by the people around them. I'm just sayin....

personally knowing how many states are in the union as opposed to having an advisor make a comment that was taken out of context about a terrorist attack aren't exactly the same thing... just sayin...

Yea, I forgot that you are REALLY concerned that our future President thinks there are 57 states in the union. LOL.

Bman wrote:

cardinal5150 wrote:

pez wrote:Just saying, some of the more conservative members of this forum jumped on the 57 states argument. And jumped on the Jeremiah Wright argument, saying that people's character is shaped by the people around them. I'm just sayin....

personally knowing how many states are in the union as opposed to having an advisor make a comment that was taken out of context about a terrorist attack aren't exactly the same thing... just sayin...

Yea, I forgot that you are REALLY concerned that our future President thinks there are 57 states in the union. LOL.

Well, prolly what we can conclude from all of this is that both these incidents have little to do with a person's ability to lead a country.

so mccain doesnt agree with charlie black.....but mccain also says...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-3T6DpPRPMY&feature=related

meta4 wrote:

cardinal5150 wrote:

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:If the aides for the presumptive Democratic candidate would have let the Muslim women behind him for a photo shoot or whatever, you can bet the mortgage that would have been across the internet faster than you can say "Change" and people would point to that and say, "See, he's a Muslim."

So it's ok to discriminate against people as long as it's in the name of Public Relations?

WTF? What discrimination occurred? Were these people denied inalienable rights?

....weak....

I believe they were asked not to attend were they not? At the very least they were denied seats behind the podium based solely on their looks by the man who is promising a "New America"..... that's weak...

cardinal5150 wrote:

meta4 wrote:

cardinal5150 wrote:

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:If the aides for the presumptive Democratic candidate would have let the Muslim women behind him for a photo shoot or whatever, you can bet the mortgage that would have been across the internet faster than you can say "Change" and people would point to that and say, "See, he's a Muslim."

So it's ok to discriminate against people as long as it's in the name of Public Relations?

WTF? What discrimination occurred? Were these people denied inalienable rights?

....weak....

I believe they were asked not to attend were they not? At the very least they were denied seats behind the podium based solely on their looks by the man who is promising a "New America"..... that's weak...

Remind me the next time you have a family picture... I want to be standing behind you. Er, on second thought, your wife, if that's ok.

Jeez, the man wants to be President, not Buddy Christ

Buddy Christ rocks...