McCain's VP????

Jugomugo wrote:

cardinal5150 wrote:

meta4 wrote:Card,

Honestly, I have a tough time reading your posts. Do you ever talk straight? Most of your political posts seem to be regurgitated directly from Beck scripture. Not sure if I'll be able to respond to all of it because it will take me a while to filter out the Glenn Beck modulation... I don't consider myself a lefty or a righty, as some others do, and hence I generally don't respond as someone reading from the "Left/Right-handed Bible". You'll have to excuse me for several moments while I continue to filter.

For the record.. I've listened to the combo or Beck, Rush and Hannity a total of maybe 10 minutes in the past month...... so if you think there is some sort of right wing guidebook I'm reading from.. I'm not, it's all pretty much common sense.. if you attack one person inexperience, as Vis said, how can you ignore the others?

So... sorry if you don't like my answers... but I wasn't interjecting a whole lot of opinion in there. You want facts on if she is ready to lead, well, look at her history. Her constituents have yet to come forward and bash her for anything. The one looming black mark is this trooper deal, and again, if he threatened to kill someone, he should have been fired. As for the employee that didn't fire her, she is the governor. If she asks you to fire someone like that, for that reason, it shouldn't be an issue. The fact that she took on her own political party for corruption should speak enough about her character.

So again.. if you want facts showing how she'll be a good leader (as the VP, remember) that's fine, but let's see some facts showing BO will be a good leader as well. He doesn't lead anything in Washington, so that pretty much crosses off all his senate experience. What's next, the Illinois legislature? And that's more luxurious than the mayor how? Anyone here know who the state reps are for our area? Anyone know who the mayor is? who sees which one doing more, mayor or state reps? Just asking questions here..

I'm sure you think you are neutral.. and if that's the case, where are all your concerns about BO?

PALIN RAISES MONEY -- FOR OBAMA! **Exclusive** Obama scores $8 million since Palin's speech from over 130,000 donors - on pace to hit $10 million by the time John McCain hits stage, campaign says... Developing...

Vis wrote:Well I guess the economy is better than I thought and those poor folk won't be needing any tax help after all.

Bman wrote:

Vis wrote:Well I guess the economy is better than I thought and those poor folk won't be needing any tax help after all.

They can't afford to NOT send $25 to the Obama campaign, all they are going to get from McCain is a federal gas tax HOLIDAY, maybe a savings of $18 to the families sending $25 to Obama. If Obama wins they will reap a benefit many times over for them and their kids.

I think palin needs to shoot her foul mouthed right wing hate some more ... obviously it is good for us.

Scooby01_98 wrote:

Bman wrote:

Vis wrote:Well I guess the economy is better than I thought and those poor folk won't be needing any tax help after all.

They can't afford to NOT send $25 to the Obama campaign, all they are going to get from McCain is a federal gas tax HOLIDAY, maybe a savings of $18 to the families sending $25 to Obama. If Obama wins they will reap a benefit many times over for them and their kids.

I think palin needs to shoot her foul mouthed right wing hate some more ... obviously it is good for us.

That's right got to got to get all that free government money now. No need to actually work for your money. No need to pay taxes Obama will support me..... such a good message.

Vis wrote:Well I guess the economy is better than I thought and those poor folk won't be needing any tax help after all.

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:Interesting article in the NY Post about the Obama campaign being behind the Palin Smear Campaign...

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09042008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/how_bam_buds_are_smearing_sarah_127414.htm

The one thing I question though is isn't the NY Post owned by News Corp, a pro-Republican company? And they're calling out US Weekly for being owned by a Democrat. Ah, more mud...anybody got a volleyball?

As a side, political affiliations aside, I do think the headline in US Weekly was very irresponsible, misleading, and borderline yellow journalism. And yes, I would say that too if they had Biden on the cover.

Jugomugo wrote:

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:Interesting article in the NY Post about the Obama campaign being behind the Palin Smear Campaign...

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09042008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/how_bam_buds_are_smearing_sarah_127414.htm

The one thing I question though is isn't the NY Post owned by News Corp, a pro-Republican company? And they're calling out US Weekly for being owned by a Democrat. Ah, more mud...anybody got a volleyball?

As a side, political affiliations aside, I do think the headline in US Weekly was very irresponsible, misleading, and borderline yellow journalism. And yes, I would say that too if they had Biden on the cover.

Hello? It's an article by Michelle Malkin, who's a right-wing extremist ala Coulter and Limbaugh.

Cincy Fan 44 wrote:Hmmm...never even heard of her. I've never seen her on the DNC Channel, er MSNBC...

floridafun wrote:just a general observation...amazing the people who dont watch debates and dont follow the activities of either party particularly..but are sure of which candidates are right or wrong for the job..

The Republican message about the Palin offspring comes across as contradictory: Hey, media, leave those kids alone — so we can use them as we see fit.

If you doubt this scenario, consider this: On Wednesday morning, a teenage boy from Alaska stood in a receiving line on an airport tarmac, being glad-handed by the potential next president of the United States — because he got his girlfriend pregnant. TV cameras were lined up in advance. The mind boggles.

floridafun wrote:just a general observation...amazing the people who dont watch debates and dont follow the activities of either party particularly..but are sure of which candidates are right or wrong for the job..

Jugomugo wrote:

The Republican message about the Palin offspring comes across as contradictory: Hey, media, leave those kids alone — so we can use them as we see fit.

If you doubt this scenario, consider this: On Wednesday morning, a teenage boy from Alaska stood in a receiving line on an airport tarmac, being glad-handed by the potential next president of the United States — because he got his girlfriend pregnant. TV cameras were lined up in advance. The mind boggles.

Markwes wrote:I guess I've given up any hope of an end to mud-slinging from the left and a start to actually promoting your candidate. Talk amongst yourselves. Enjoy!

Bman wrote:

Markwes wrote:I guess I've given up any hope of an end to mud-slinging from the left and a start to actually promoting your candidate. Talk amongst yourselves. Enjoy!

Oh .. Guiliani, thompson, Romney, PALIN and all were not slinging shit too?